\n
Grader-Score Judgement<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Subjective grade scores with ranges are oftentimes difficult to standardize. As such, they will not be reviewed or changed in a regrade request without definitive support that the rubric item was fully met. If there is a rubric item with a range for deductions (\u201cup to -X points\u201d) and the student feels that the deduction was simply \u201ctoo harsh\u201d or \u201cunfair\u201d will not be reviewed. \u00a0<\/span>Our grading procedures include a high-level view of all graders’ assigned grades, allowing us to systematically review this rather than looking case-by-case.<\/p>\nRubric items without a range for deductions (-X points) will not be reviewed without definitive support that the rubric item was fully met. These rubric items are \u201call or nothing\u201d meaning the student fully met the requirement(s) and received full credit, or the student did not fully meet the requirement (regardless of the percentage of requirements met) and received no credit.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”eba1c8ee-1c82-4d37-ba61-59e882973127″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n
\n
Grade Chasing<\/o:p><\/h3>\n<\/div>\nPer-project grade-chasing or chasing a higher grade on multiple projects creates additional overhead to the course staff that takes away from providing assistance to students and completing course improvements. The staff would rather assist students in learning the material and be generous at the end of the course than spending precious time debating minor grade improvements on individual assignments throughout the semester.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”eba1c8ee-1c82-4d37-ba61-59e882973127″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n
\n
\n
Regrade Request Outcome<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
The outcome of the regrade request will be handled via a new Canvas comment attached to the assignment in question only. To get notifications of a new Canvas comment, review the notification settings of Canvas.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”eba1c8ee-1c82-4d37-ba61-59e882973127″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n
\n
Regrade Appeals<\/o:p><\/h3>\n<\/div>\nThere are multiple stages of the regrading process. At the completion of each stage, a Canvas comment will be added to the student\u2019s assignment in question. If a student feels the answer is not satisfactory, the student can invoke the next stage by resubmitting the Assignment Follow-Up Form again. The stages are outlined below.<\/p>\n
Stage I (Grader)<\/h4>\n
The original grader reviews the request, summarizes the re-evaluation findings to the Head TA. The Head TA will ensure that the findings are in line with the rubric and submit the result to the student.<\/p>\n
Stage II (Head TA)<\/h4>\n
The Head TA will re-evaluate the student assignment, review both the student and grader comments and make a determination.<\/p>\n
Stage III (Instructor)<\/h4>\n
The instructor will re-evaluate the student assignment, review the student, grader, and Head TA comments and make a determination.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”eba1c8ee-1c82-4d37-ba61-59e882973127″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n
\n
Response Timeline<\/o:p><\/h2>\nThe workload of the course staff is high. We cannot guarantee a turnaround time on regrade requests. We always prioritize new grading first, followed by those regrade requests that have the greatest potential to affect the student’s average. We do guarantee to handle all regrade requests that potentially could affect a final letter grade by the end of the term; regrade requests that will not ultimately make a difference may be ignored. Do not create a new request, ask on Ed Discussion or any other medium. This will only hinder the process leading to extended time to process requests.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Assignment Follow-UpThe items and information outlined in this page outline the process for receiving clarification or regrade requests.24\/7 Rule 24 Hours 24 hours after grades have been posted is identified as the \u201creview\u201d period. This allows the students to take the time to conduct an in-depth review of the grader feedback, own work and devise […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":3794,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3831","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lucylabs.gatech.edu\/ml4t\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lucylabs.gatech.edu\/ml4t\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lucylabs.gatech.edu\/ml4t\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lucylabs.gatech.edu\/ml4t\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lucylabs.gatech.edu\/ml4t\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3831"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/lucylabs.gatech.edu\/ml4t\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3831\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3988,"href":"https:\/\/lucylabs.gatech.edu\/ml4t\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3831\/revisions\/3988"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lucylabs.gatech.edu\/ml4t\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3794"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lucylabs.gatech.edu\/ml4t\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}